Larry Klayman
September 24, 2012
"Quel Surprise," as they say in France. It turns out that both President Barack Hussein Obama and Gov. Mitt Romney now believe that Washington, D.C., cannot be reformed from within and that only We the People hold the keys to saving the kingdom. The "mullah in chief" made this "revelation" — contrary to his earlier pronouncements during his 2008 campaign that only he could effect change from inside government — this week during an interview on Latin television in Miami.
Romney, the would-be "flip-flopper in chief," on the other hand, who said the same thing as Obama during his 2008 primary presidential campaign, now — to take a cheap political shot at Obama — says that if elected to the presidency, only he can make change from the banks of the Potomac.
In short, these two hypocritical lying fools are themselves mascots for what is wrong with our country's leadership and why we are sinking faster than a rock domestically and overseas. Yes, change must come from outside of Washington, D.C., as We the People have been lied to and abused for too long by the likes of both Obama and Romney. It's time for revolution, plain and simple.
But how did we come full circle to the point of revolution, just 236 years after the Declaration of Independence was signed in Philadelphia? Just look at the words and deeds of our presidents in the last 50 years, and you can see a worsening pattern of deceit and corruption among them.
Following the death of President John F. Kennedy in 1963, the cavalcade of slimeballs in the White House (except for President Ronald Reagan) reached epidemic proportions. First, there was President Lyndon Baines Johnson, who lied his way into committing more than 500,000 troops to Vietnam, resulting in over 55,000 deaths and hundreds of thousands maimed. And, having lost the war to boot, as it now turns out, Vietnam is on friendly terms with the United States and hardly a major problem. There is also some evidence to suggest that Johnson, a ruthless and corrupt man who came into the presidency as a former school teacher and congressman and "miraculously" left a multi-millionaire — and who can be heard soliciting bribes on White House recordings available on C-SPAN 's archives — may have had a role in his predecessor's assassination.
Following Johnson, We the People were treated to President Richard Nixon and the famous Watergate scandal, where our commander in chief also can be heard on White House tape recordings conspiring to obstruct justice by planning burglaries, bribing witnesses and an assortment of other crimes. Ironically, despite this, and only by default, Nixon was hardly the worst president of my lifetime, despite having put into effect a disastrous wage and price freeze that sent companies like my father's and grandfather's pork-packing business, I. Klayman & Co., into bankruptcy. At least, to his credit, he was not a traitor, as several other presidents following him proved to be.
When President Nixon was forced to resign over Watergate, the next occupant of the Oval Office became Gerald Ford. Never elected, but ascending from appointed vice president to the office of the president by default, Ford was too disengaged and vacuous to do real damage. He was simply a caretaker until defeated by the peanut farmer and then-governor of Georgia, Jimmy Carter, in 1976.
In the four years Carter controlled the presidency, he nearly destroyed the nation both economically and in foreign affairs. While his economic attack on the nation is well-known — inflation over 20 percent by the time he was thrown out of office — as a latent anti-Semite he bent over to Muslim interests in Iran, effectively participating in the overthrow of the shah, who was a great friend to the United States and the West in general. In his place came the current crop of Neo-Nazi Islamic mullahs in Tehran, who now are on the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons with their avowed goal to destroy Israel and the United States, not to mention wanting to annihilate as may Jews and Christians as they get their hands on as part of their effort to spearhead a Muslim revolution in the Middle East and worldwide. Carter's disdain for Israel and Jews did not come without reward. Just look on the wall of the lobby to his presidential library at my alma mater Emory University in Atlanta, and you will find the names of filthy rich Arabs (some of whom were indicted in the infamous BCCI banking scandal) who mostly paid for this testament to his traitorous deceit.
President Ronald Reagan, despite Iran-Contra (which I believe can be attributed to a dishonest rogue White House aide named Col. Oliver North), was the only great president in my lifetime, if not the best in American history. For an all-too-brief eight years, he restored American confidence and courage and set us on an upward path to greatness.
But this was dashed when he was succeeded by his vice president, George H.W. Bush, in 1988, who quickly proceeded to raise taxes, contrary to his election pledge to the American people. His lying self played a large role in his loss to Bill Clinton in 1992.
The next eight years saw a world indoor record for corruption and scandal, as Bill Clinton, "the criminal in chief," with the aid of his felonious first lady, Hillary, perpetrated over 38 scandals, including his traitorous acts I helped uncover in the Chinagate scandal. The Monica Lewinsky scandal, for which Clinton was impeached, was in reality the least of Clinton's misdeeds. His lying became so infamous that David Schippers, the House impeachment manager, wrote an epic book entitled "No One Left to Lie To."
Following Clinton, of course, came President George W. Bush, who lied his way into the deadly, costly and counterproductive Iraq war, and now President Obama, whose lying, deceit and traitorous acts are regrettably all-too-fresh in our minds.
Yes, Washington, D.C., must be legally dismantled, and it must come from outside of this indelibly corrupt town. For once, Obama and Romney are both right, but their means to effect needed change are at odds with our own.
To the barricades, patriots!
Monday, September 24, 2012
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Please Share....Mychal Massie is a respected writer and talk show host in Los Angeles.........The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disrespect) their Christmas family picture."
The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation. I've made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don't like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.
I don't hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama's raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.
I don't like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people. The Reagan's made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish. Obama's arrogance by appointing 32 leftist czars and constantly bypassing congress is impeachable. Eric Holder is probably the MOST incompetent and arrogant DOJ head to ever hold the job. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?
Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama's have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths. They are verbally abusive to the citizenry, and they display an animus for civility.
I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to now being able to be proud of America. I view that statement and that mindset as an insult to those who died to provide a country where a Kenyan, his illegal alien relatives, and his alleged progeny, could come and not only live freely, but rise to the highest, most powerful, position in the world. Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do same.
I have a saying, that "the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide." No president in history has spent millions of dollars to keep his records and his past sealed.
And what the two of them have shared has been proved to be lies. He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother's death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family. He has lied about his father's military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nausea. He lied to the world about the Supreme Court in a State of the Union address. He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman. He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today. He opposed rulings that protected women and children that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support. He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to I srael. His wife treats being the First Lady as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world). I condemn them because, as people are suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement - as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.
I don't like them, and I neither apologize nor retreat from my public condemnation of them and of his policies. We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.
Dislike for them has nothing to do with the color of their skin; it has everything to do with their behavior, attitudes, and policies. And I have open scorn for their constantly playing the race card.
It is my intention to do all within my ability to ensure their reign is one term. I could go on, but let me conclude with this. I condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate them, as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are. There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people, as these two are permitted out of fear for their color.
As I wrote in a syndicated column titled, "Nero In The White House" - "Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood... Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a cwhile America's people go homeless, hungry and unemployed."ongenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation, and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement - while America's peo
The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation. I've made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don't like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.
I don't hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama's raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.
I don't like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people. The Reagan's made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish. Obama's arrogance by appointing 32 leftist czars and constantly bypassing congress is impeachable. Eric Holder is probably the MOST incompetent and arrogant DOJ head to ever hold the job. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?
Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama's have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths. They are verbally abusive to the citizenry, and they display an animus for civility.
I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to now being able to be proud of America. I view that statement and that mindset as an insult to those who died to provide a country where a Kenyan, his illegal alien relatives, and his alleged progeny, could come and not only live freely, but rise to the highest, most powerful, position in the world. Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do same.
I have a saying, that "the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide." No president in history has spent millions of dollars to keep his records and his past sealed.
And what the two of them have shared has been proved to be lies. He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother's death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family. He has lied about his father's military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nausea. He lied to the world about the Supreme Court in a State of the Union address. He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman. He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today. He opposed rulings that protected women and children that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support. He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to I srael. His wife treats being the First Lady as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world). I condemn them because, as people are suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement - as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.
I don't like them, and I neither apologize nor retreat from my public condemnation of them and of his policies. We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.
Dislike for them has nothing to do with the color of their skin; it has everything to do with their behavior, attitudes, and policies. And I have open scorn for their constantly playing the race card.
It is my intention to do all within my ability to ensure their reign is one term. I could go on, but let me conclude with this. I condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate them, as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are. There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people, as these two are permitted out of fear for their color.
As I wrote in a syndicated column titled, "Nero In The White House" - "Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood... Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a cwhile America's people go homeless, hungry and unemployed."ongenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation, and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement - while America's peo
Michelle Malkin
Please Share..2 MICHELLES, 2 AMERICAS & SHAME vs. PRIDE
By Michelle Malkin, Columnist
Like Michelle Obama, I am a 'woman of color.' Like Michelle Obama, I am a working mother of two young children. Like Michelle Obama, I am a member of the 13th generation of Americans born since the founding of our great nation.
Unlike Michelle Obama, I can't keep track of the number of times I've been proud - really proud - of my country since I was born and privileged to live in it. At a recent speech in Milwaukee on behalf of her husband's Democratic presidential campaign, Mrs. Obama remarked, 'For the first time in my adult life time, I am really proud of my country, and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change.'
Mrs. Obama's statement was met with warm applause from other Barack supporters who have also apparently been devoid of pride in their country during their adult lifetimes. Or maybe it was just a Pavlovian response to the word 'change.' What a sad, empty, narcissistic, ungrateful, unthinking lot!
I'm just seven years younger than Ms. Obama. We've grown up and lived in the same era. And yet, her self-absorbed attitude is completely foreign to me. What planet is she living on? Since when was now the only time the American people have ever been 'hungry for change'?
Michelle, ma belle, Barack is not the center of the universe, he is just another half-black man who has been AFFILIATED with the wrong people, namely a so called preacher who not only takes The Lord's Name in Vain, he also has been closely associated with muslims who wants to destroy our Christian heritage. Newsflash: The Obamas did not invent 'change' any more than Hillary invented 'leadership' or John McCain invented 'straight talk.' We were both adults when the Berlin Wall fell, Michelle. That was earth-shattering change.
We've lived through two decades' worth of peaceful, if contentious, election cycles under the rule of law, which have brought about 'change' and upheaval, both good and bad. We were adults through several launches of the space shuttle, in case you were snoozing.
And as adults, we've witnessed and benefited from dizzyingly rapid advances in technology, communications, science, and medicine pioneered by American entrepreneurs who yearned to change the world and succeeded. You want 'change'? Go ask the patients whose lives have been improved and extended by American pharmaceutical companies that have flourished under the best economic system in the world.
If American ingenuity, a robust constitutional republic, and the fall of communism don't do it for you, hon, then how about American heroism and sacrifice? How about every Memorial Day? Every Veterans Day? Every Independence Day? Every Medal of Honor ceremony? Has she never attended a welcome-home ceremony for the troops? For me, there's the thrill of the Blue Angels roaring over cloudless skies. And the somber awe felt amid the hallowed waters that surround the sunken U.S.S. Arizona at the Pearl Harbor memorial.
Every naturalization ceremony I've attended, where hundreds of new Americans raised their hands to swear an oath of allegiance to this land of liberty, has been a moment of pride for me. So have the awesome displays of American compassion at home and around the world. When millions of Americans rallied to help victims of the 2004 tsunami in Southeast Asia - including members of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group that sped from Hong Kong to assist survivors - my heart filled with pride. It did again when the citizens of Houston opened their arms to Hurricane Katrina victims and folks across the country rushed to their churches and offices of the Salvation Army and Red Cross to volunteer.
How about American resilience? Does that not make you proud, Michelle? Only a heart of stone could be unmoved by the strength, valor, and determination displayed in New York , Washington , D.C., and Shanksville , Pa. , on September 11, 2001.
I believe it was Michael Kinsley who quipped that a gaffe is when a politician tells the truth. In this case, it's what happens when an elite Democratic politician's wife says what a significant portion of the party's base really believes to be the truth: America is more a source of shame than pride.
Michelle Obama has achieved enormous professional success largely due to White people doing things for her and him. Helping her and him in almost every step in their life. She shows her true feelings by hating White people. Her accomplishments can be attributed to White people for their gradualism throughout her life. She needs to cease hating White people and thank them for much of what she has, political influence, and personal acclaim in America . Ivy League educated, she's been lauded by Essence magazine, By 'The Harvard 100' most influential alumni. She has had an amazingly blessed life. But, you wouldn't know it from her hatred of White people, campaign rhetoric and her griping about her and her husband's student loans.
For years, we've heard liberals get offended at any challenge to their patriotism. And so they are again aggrieved and rising to explain away Mrs. Obama's remarks.
Lady Michelle and her defenders protest too much! She and He are where they are today because of what the White People have done for both of them. However, both have expressed their dislike for White people!
(Michelle Malkin is a newspaper columnist.)
It Couldn't Have Been Said Any Better!
By Michelle Malkin, Columnist
Like Michelle Obama, I am a 'woman of color.' Like Michelle Obama, I am a working mother of two young children. Like Michelle Obama, I am a member of the 13th generation of Americans born since the founding of our great nation.
Unlike Michelle Obama, I can't keep track of the number of times I've been proud - really proud - of my country since I was born and privileged to live in it. At a recent speech in Milwaukee on behalf of her husband's Democratic presidential campaign, Mrs. Obama remarked, 'For the first time in my adult life time, I am really proud of my country, and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change.'
Mrs. Obama's statement was met with warm applause from other Barack supporters who have also apparently been devoid of pride in their country during their adult lifetimes. Or maybe it was just a Pavlovian response to the word 'change.' What a sad, empty, narcissistic, ungrateful, unthinking lot!
I'm just seven years younger than Ms. Obama. We've grown up and lived in the same era. And yet, her self-absorbed attitude is completely foreign to me. What planet is she living on? Since when was now the only time the American people have ever been 'hungry for change'?
Michelle, ma belle, Barack is not the center of the universe, he is just another half-black man who has been AFFILIATED with the wrong people, namely a so called preacher who not only takes The Lord's Name in Vain, he also has been closely associated with muslims who wants to destroy our Christian heritage. Newsflash: The Obamas did not invent 'change' any more than Hillary invented 'leadership' or John McCain invented 'straight talk.' We were both adults when the Berlin Wall fell, Michelle. That was earth-shattering change.
We've lived through two decades' worth of peaceful, if contentious, election cycles under the rule of law, which have brought about 'change' and upheaval, both good and bad. We were adults through several launches of the space shuttle, in case you were snoozing.
And as adults, we've witnessed and benefited from dizzyingly rapid advances in technology, communications, science, and medicine pioneered by American entrepreneurs who yearned to change the world and succeeded. You want 'change'? Go ask the patients whose lives have been improved and extended by American pharmaceutical companies that have flourished under the best economic system in the world.
If American ingenuity, a robust constitutional republic, and the fall of communism don't do it for you, hon, then how about American heroism and sacrifice? How about every Memorial Day? Every Veterans Day? Every Independence Day? Every Medal of Honor ceremony? Has she never attended a welcome-home ceremony for the troops? For me, there's the thrill of the Blue Angels roaring over cloudless skies. And the somber awe felt amid the hallowed waters that surround the sunken U.S.S. Arizona at the Pearl Harbor memorial.
Every naturalization ceremony I've attended, where hundreds of new Americans raised their hands to swear an oath of allegiance to this land of liberty, has been a moment of pride for me. So have the awesome displays of American compassion at home and around the world. When millions of Americans rallied to help victims of the 2004 tsunami in Southeast Asia - including members of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group that sped from Hong Kong to assist survivors - my heart filled with pride. It did again when the citizens of Houston opened their arms to Hurricane Katrina victims and folks across the country rushed to their churches and offices of the Salvation Army and Red Cross to volunteer.
How about American resilience? Does that not make you proud, Michelle? Only a heart of stone could be unmoved by the strength, valor, and determination displayed in New York , Washington , D.C., and Shanksville , Pa. , on September 11, 2001.
I believe it was Michael Kinsley who quipped that a gaffe is when a politician tells the truth. In this case, it's what happens when an elite Democratic politician's wife says what a significant portion of the party's base really believes to be the truth: America is more a source of shame than pride.
Michelle Obama has achieved enormous professional success largely due to White people doing things for her and him. Helping her and him in almost every step in their life. She shows her true feelings by hating White people. Her accomplishments can be attributed to White people for their gradualism throughout her life. She needs to cease hating White people and thank them for much of what she has, political influence, and personal acclaim in America . Ivy League educated, she's been lauded by Essence magazine, By 'The Harvard 100' most influential alumni. She has had an amazingly blessed life. But, you wouldn't know it from her hatred of White people, campaign rhetoric and her griping about her and her husband's student loans.
For years, we've heard liberals get offended at any challenge to their patriotism. And so they are again aggrieved and rising to explain away Mrs. Obama's remarks.
Lady Michelle and her defenders protest too much! She and He are where they are today because of what the White People have done for both of them. However, both have expressed their dislike for White people!
(Michelle Malkin is a newspaper columnist.)
It Couldn't Have Been Said Any Better!
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
God and his final!!!
In the end, it will not matter what you believe or I believe about something that will matter but what GOD Says about it. GOD is not arbitrary and you will not be able to argue with GOD. HE will Judge you according to HIS Righteousness. Just because you want something to be acceptable doesn't mean it will be acceptable. GOD has the final Say. Something to think about!
A remark from Newt!!
Dear Friend,
Four years ago, when candidate Obama walked out among the Greek columns into a Colorado stadium filled with 75,000 people, many Americans were excited about politics. After nearly a decade of wars and years of intense partisanship, Obama seemed to be offering something new. He seemed to be offering Hope.
It was a brand Obama himself did much to create, from his 2004 speech at the Democratic Convention -- in which he called on Americans to reject division, asking, “Do we participate in a politics of cynicism, or do we participate in a politics of hope?” – to his 2008 acceptance speech, which he concluded by declaring that “At this moment, in this election… let us keep that promise, that American promise, and in the words of scripture hold firmly, without wavering, to the hope that we confess.”
As the new documentary The Hope and the Change by Citizens United reminds us, to Democrats, Independents, and even some Republicans, Obama represented exactly what they needed most as the economy was crumbling around them.
The Hope and the Change introduces us to dozens of these fellow Americans – Democrats and Independents who voted for Obama and the hope he promised. In fact, the movie begins with voter after voter speaking about how they’ve been Democrats their entire life, and how excited they were to vote for Barack Obama for president.
But how do these Obama voters feel about the President today? They’re profoundly disappointed.
Disappointment
The picture that emerges from the words of these Independent voters is of a president who devoted his attention to an increasingly ideological and irresponsible agenda. His plan to fix the economy consisted of bailouts and “stimulus” that did nothing to jumpstart the economy or create jobs, but wasted hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars on political payoffs. It wasn’t exactly the change voters were hoping for.
What do they have to say about President Obama’s economic agenda?
“I don’t know where this money’s going, because I don’t see anything happening here – I see quite the opposite,” says one woman who voted for Obama in 2008.
“I have no idea where the money went,” says another.
It’s clear to these voters that wherever the money went, it hasn’t worked. One woman says she “can’t drive through [her] neighborhood without seeing at least four or five foreclosure signs.”
President Obama quickly moved on to ideas even farther afield from what these voters had in mind, proposing cap and trade legislation that would have crippled the fragile economy and forcing a government takeover of health care without a single vote from across the aisle. They weren’t fooled by the President’s distraction.
“When Obama proposed the universal healthcare –government-run health care – we were mired in debt, unemployment was an issue, the bailouts had just happened, so here we were with all these negatives, and the President said you know, ‘Let’s wag the dog, let’s focus on health care.”
“It’s actually a diversion, it’s like a magician,” said one woman. “You look this way, and you sort of don’t see what’s happening the other way. And that’s actually what he’s doing.”
“It’s kind of like lighting a fire on the left side of the room so you don’t see the building collapsing on the right,” said another.
The Americans we hear from in The Hope and the Change can barely recognize the man they voted for. “Yes We Can” has turned into “Why We Couldn’t.” The representative of unity has turned into a divisive left-wing ideologue.
“One of the changes that Barack had talked about in 2008 was to make a more united United States. He’s divided the United States,” a former Obama supporter said.
If you want to see why President Obama is worried this November, watch The Hope and the Change.
Your friend,
Newt
Four years ago, when candidate Obama walked out among the Greek columns into a Colorado stadium filled with 75,000 people, many Americans were excited about politics. After nearly a decade of wars and years of intense partisanship, Obama seemed to be offering something new. He seemed to be offering Hope.
It was a brand Obama himself did much to create, from his 2004 speech at the Democratic Convention -- in which he called on Americans to reject division, asking, “Do we participate in a politics of cynicism, or do we participate in a politics of hope?” – to his 2008 acceptance speech, which he concluded by declaring that “At this moment, in this election… let us keep that promise, that American promise, and in the words of scripture hold firmly, without wavering, to the hope that we confess.”
As the new documentary The Hope and the Change by Citizens United reminds us, to Democrats, Independents, and even some Republicans, Obama represented exactly what they needed most as the economy was crumbling around them.
The Hope and the Change introduces us to dozens of these fellow Americans – Democrats and Independents who voted for Obama and the hope he promised. In fact, the movie begins with voter after voter speaking about how they’ve been Democrats their entire life, and how excited they were to vote for Barack Obama for president.
But how do these Obama voters feel about the President today? They’re profoundly disappointed.
Disappointment
The picture that emerges from the words of these Independent voters is of a president who devoted his attention to an increasingly ideological and irresponsible agenda. His plan to fix the economy consisted of bailouts and “stimulus” that did nothing to jumpstart the economy or create jobs, but wasted hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars on political payoffs. It wasn’t exactly the change voters were hoping for.
What do they have to say about President Obama’s economic agenda?
“I don’t know where this money’s going, because I don’t see anything happening here – I see quite the opposite,” says one woman who voted for Obama in 2008.
“I have no idea where the money went,” says another.
It’s clear to these voters that wherever the money went, it hasn’t worked. One woman says she “can’t drive through [her] neighborhood without seeing at least four or five foreclosure signs.”
President Obama quickly moved on to ideas even farther afield from what these voters had in mind, proposing cap and trade legislation that would have crippled the fragile economy and forcing a government takeover of health care without a single vote from across the aisle. They weren’t fooled by the President’s distraction.
“When Obama proposed the universal healthcare –government-run health care – we were mired in debt, unemployment was an issue, the bailouts had just happened, so here we were with all these negatives, and the President said you know, ‘Let’s wag the dog, let’s focus on health care.”
“It’s actually a diversion, it’s like a magician,” said one woman. “You look this way, and you sort of don’t see what’s happening the other way. And that’s actually what he’s doing.”
“It’s kind of like lighting a fire on the left side of the room so you don’t see the building collapsing on the right,” said another.
The Americans we hear from in The Hope and the Change can barely recognize the man they voted for. “Yes We Can” has turned into “Why We Couldn’t.” The representative of unity has turned into a divisive left-wing ideologue.
“One of the changes that Barack had talked about in 2008 was to make a more united United States. He’s divided the United States,” a former Obama supporter said.
If you want to see why President Obama is worried this November, watch The Hope and the Change.
Your friend,
Newt
Monday, September 10, 2012
Jerusalem Prayer Team
Is Hezbollah Training Terrorists in Nicaragua?
Several days ago Israeli radio reported that Iran has established Hezbollah training bases in Nicaragua. While there has been nothing to substantiate the report thus far, the idea is not all that far-fetched.
The report out of Israel claims that some 30 members of Hezbollah are being trained at a base camp located in northern Nicaragua and that the area has been cordoned off from local resident access. It is reported that all supplies being shipped into the base have originated from Iran.
Let’s ask and answer a couple of questions.
Is there a relationship between Nicaragua and Iran / Hezbollah?
Yes, in fact, there is. According to a former Iranian official who is fully aware of the Iranian terrorist network, “The Quds Force has established a command and control center in both Bolivia and Venezuela.
At the recent foreign ministers meeting of the Non-Aligned Movement held in Tehran, Nicaraguan Foreign Minister Samuel Santos Lopez clearly stated his country’s perspective on Iran. “We have always supported Iran’s peaceful nuclear program and believe that all countries are entitled to peaceful nuclear energy.” He emphasized the mutual direction of Nicaragua and Iran, saying, “We will make our best efforts to further enhance all-out ties between the two countries.”
Why would Iran / Hezbollah want to train terrorists in Nicaragua?
Hassan Abassi, a Quds strategist has said that several hundred targets have been identified for a potential attack on the US. Iranian General Masoud Jazayeri said, “In the face of any attack, we will have a crushing response.” The head of the Iranian Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Hassan Firoozabadi, said that America and European countries should expect major attacks by al-Qaeda and other terrorists in their homelands.
Given what we know about Iran’s relationship with Nicaragua, and their plans for potential attacks on the US, and given that Iran does not have the capability of reaching the US in any other fashion, it is indeed plausible that Hezbollah is training terrorists in Nicaragua.
We have reported this for one reason, and one reason alone. This is a battle that belongs to the Lord. It is beyond our physical limitations to do anything about it. But God has given us the ability to pray. So let us pray that Almighty God, who we worship and serve, will intervene on behalf of those who trust Him, and win the battle we cannot fight.
For more on this story, visit: http://
Several days ago Israeli radio reported that Iran has established Hezbollah training bases in Nicaragua. While there has been nothing to substantiate the report thus far, the idea is not all that far-fetched.
The report out of Israel claims that some 30 members of Hezbollah are being trained at a base camp located in northern Nicaragua and that the area has been cordoned off from local resident access. It is reported that all supplies being shipped into the base have originated from Iran.
Let’s ask and answer a couple of questions.
Is there a relationship between Nicaragua and Iran / Hezbollah?
Yes, in fact, there is. According to a former Iranian official who is fully aware of the Iranian terrorist network, “The Quds Force has established a command and control center in both Bolivia and Venezuela.
At the recent foreign ministers meeting of the Non-Aligned Movement held in Tehran, Nicaraguan Foreign Minister Samuel Santos Lopez clearly stated his country’s perspective on Iran. “We have always supported Iran’s peaceful nuclear program and believe that all countries are entitled to peaceful nuclear energy.” He emphasized the mutual direction of Nicaragua and Iran, saying, “We will make our best efforts to further enhance all-out ties between the two countries.”
Why would Iran / Hezbollah want to train terrorists in Nicaragua?
Hassan Abassi, a Quds strategist has said that several hundred targets have been identified for a potential attack on the US. Iranian General Masoud Jazayeri said, “In the face of any attack, we will have a crushing response.” The head of the Iranian Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Hassan Firoozabadi, said that America and European countries should expect major attacks by al-Qaeda and other terrorists in their homelands.
Given what we know about Iran’s relationship with Nicaragua, and their plans for potential attacks on the US, and given that Iran does not have the capability of reaching the US in any other fashion, it is indeed plausible that Hezbollah is training terrorists in Nicaragua.
We have reported this for one reason, and one reason alone. This is a battle that belongs to the Lord. It is beyond our physical limitations to do anything about it. But God has given us the ability to pray. So let us pray that Almighty God, who we worship and serve, will intervene on behalf of those who trust Him, and win the battle we cannot fight.
For more on this story, visit: http://
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)